I can’t say I didn’t see this coming. But
wow, poor Eleanor. I felt like Richie – while we knew he was volatile – wouldn’t
actually want to kill her. I gave him to much the benefit of the doubt. I feel
that this is far too common a reaction to seeing abuse.
When Eleanor gets to her aunt and uncles
house, she overhears her uncle almost brushing off what she went through by
saying “What if she isn’t telling the truth?” I can understand fear being
replaced with skepticism, when the facts are explained, but in no way, NONE,
was her uncle justified in trying to sweep Eleanor’s siblings under the rug by questioning
the truthfulness of her story. What sixteen-year-old kid would drive all
through the night to show up unannounced and proclaim she was being hunted by
her stepfather just for it all to be a joke?
Of everything that happened in our last
reading, Eleanor and Park’s date, their day alone, the catastrophe that is
Richie, the drive to Minnesota, or Park finally
driving a stick, the thing that disgusted me the most was that single line from
her uncle. We knew Richie was going to happen – he was a time-bomb. We knew
Park would be ready to save his love – he had already kicked Steve in the face
for her. And we knew that Eleanor would try to distance herself from Park after
saying good-bye – her clear refusal to say the word “love” to Park was evidence
enough of that. I just never expected that the relief of being away from Richie
could be ruined so quickly – from one line. I respect Rowell for that. That was
artful.
I’m sad the book is over – as I am with
almost every book – and I am happy the Eleanor and Park turned out ok (as far
as we can tell) and I am glad that everything wasn’t just fixed with a magic
wand, they still had to struggle, they had to fight for safety and that made it
real.
Love the emoji story. I agree. Rowell did an excellent job.
ReplyDelete